Scott, Kevin

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 26, 2017
DocketWR-84,221-02
StatusPublished

This text of Scott, Kevin (Scott, Kevin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott, Kevin, (Tex. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-84,221-02

EX PARTE KEVIN SCOTT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 18616B IN THE 104TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of assault-family

violence and sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Scott v. State, No. 11-14-00131-CR (Tex. App.—Eastland, Aug. 6, 2015).

Applicant contends, among other things, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective

assistance because counsel failed to advise him of his right to file petition for discretionary review

pro se.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court 2

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to advise him of his

right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted.

Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is

entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of

the Eleventh Court of Appeals in Cause No. 11-14-00131-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case

No. 18616-B from the 104th District Court of Taylor County, Texas. Applicant shall file his petition

for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate

issues.

Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex Parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1997).

Delivered: July 26, 2017

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott, Kevin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-kevin-texcrimapp-2017.