Scott Gregory Hummel v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 15, 2004
Docket02-03-00357-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Scott Gregory Hummel v. State (Scott Gregory Hummel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott Gregory Hummel v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

 

NO. 2-03-357-CR

 
 

SCOTT GREGORY HUMMEL                                                    APPELLANT

 

V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                  STATE

 
 

------------

 

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

   

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

 

        After pleading guilty, Appellant Scott Gregory Hummel was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and the jury assessed his punishment at twenty and thirty years’ confinement respectively in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The trial court sentenced him accordingly.

        In one issue, Appellant contends that the trial court erred by not listing the terms and conditions of community supervision in the jury charge.  As Appellant recognizes, this court has held otherwise.2  We decline Appellant’s invitation to overrule our prior opinions.  Consequently, we hold that the trial court did not err in refusing to list the terms and conditions of community supervision in the jury charge.  We overrule Appellant’s sole issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

                                                                  PER CURIAM

PANEL F:   DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 15, 2004


NOTES

1.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2.  See Cagle v. State, 23 S.W.3d 590, 594-95 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2000, pet. ref’d); McNamara v. State, 900 S.W.2d 466, 467-68 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNamara v. State
900 S.W.2d 466 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Cagle v. State
23 S.W.3d 590 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott Gregory Hummel v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-gregory-hummel-v-state-texapp-2004.