Scott Goldsmith v. CIR
This text of Scott Goldsmith v. CIR (Scott Goldsmith v. CIR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-1346 ___________________________
Scott Kimrey Goldsmith
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee ____________
Appeal from The United States Tax Court ____________
Submitted: February 15, 2019 Filed: February 25, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Scott Goldsmith appeals from a tax court1 decision, which granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and sustained a notice of federal tax lien, in proceedings Goldsmith initiated under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6320 and
1 The Honorable Mark V. Holmes, United States Tax Court Judge. 6330. Following a careful de novo review, see Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. Comm’r, 594 F.3d 968, 970 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the tax court’s grant of summary judgment de novo), we conclude that the Commissioner’s determination was correct, for the reasons explained by the tax court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott Goldsmith v. CIR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-goldsmith-v-cir-ca8-2019.