Scott Goldsmith v. CIR

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2019
Docket18-1346
StatusUnpublished

This text of Scott Goldsmith v. CIR (Scott Goldsmith v. CIR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott Goldsmith v. CIR, (8th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-1346 ___________________________

Scott Kimrey Goldsmith

lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant

v.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue

lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee ____________

Appeal from The United States Tax Court ____________

Submitted: February 15, 2019 Filed: February 25, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Scott Goldsmith appeals from a tax court1 decision, which granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and sustained a notice of federal tax lien, in proceedings Goldsmith initiated under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6320 and

1 The Honorable Mark V. Holmes, United States Tax Court Judge. 6330. Following a careful de novo review, see Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. Comm’r, 594 F.3d 968, 970 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the tax court’s grant of summary judgment de novo), we conclude that the Commissioner’s determination was correct, for the reasons explained by the tax court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nestlé Purina Petcare Co. v. Commissioner
594 F.3d 968 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scott Goldsmith v. CIR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-goldsmith-v-cir-ca8-2019.