Scott Frenkel v. Stephen Courtney, M.D.
This text of Scott Frenkel v. Stephen Courtney, M.D. (Scott Frenkel v. Stephen Courtney, M.D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered March 25, 2022
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Nos. 05-21-01114-CV, 05-22-00158-CV
KELLY M. LIEBBE AND JONATHAN RUTE, Appellants
V.
STEPHEN COURTNEY, M.D. AND STEPHEN COURTNEY, M.D., P.A., Appellees
On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296-03470-2016
ORDER Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith
Before the Court is appellant Kelly M. Liebbe’s March 9, 2022 amended
emergency motion for temporary relief requesting that the court defer the deadline
for appellant’s compliance with the trial court’s sanctions orders pending
resolution of the appeals. Appellant’s supersedeas deposit with the trial court clerk
suspends enforcement of the appealed sanctions orders while the appeal is pending.
Page 1 of 2 See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.1(a)(3), (f); Chambers v. Pruitt, 241 S.W.3d 679, 683 (Tex.
App.—Dallas 2007, no pet.). Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion.
/s/ Robbie Partida-Kipness ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott Frenkel v. Stephen Courtney, M.D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-frenkel-v-stephen-courtney-md-texapp-2022.