Scott Frenkel v. Stephen Courtney, M.D.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 25, 2022·No. 05-21-01114-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered March 25, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Nos. 05-21-01114-CV,

05-22-00158-CV

KELLY M. LIEBBE AND JONATHAN RUTE, Appellants V.

STEPHEN COURTNEY, M.D. AND STEPHEN COURTNEY, M.D., P.A., Appellees

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-03470-2016

ORDER

Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith

Before the Court is appellant Kelly M. Liebbe’s March 9, 2022 amended emergency motion for temporary relief requesting that the court defer the deadline for appellant’s compliance with the trial court’s sanctions orders pending resolution of the appeals. Appellant’s supersedeas deposit with the trial court clerk suspends enforcement of the appealed sanctions orders while the appeal is pending.

Page 1 of 2

See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.1(a)(3), (f); Chambers v. Pruitt, 241 S.W.3d 679, 683 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, no pet.). Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion.

/s/ Robbie Partida-Kipness ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS

JUSTICE

Page 2 of 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott Frenkel v. Stephen Courtney, M.D., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Scott Frenkel v. Stephen Courtney, M.D. (Scott Frenkel v. Stephen Courtney, M.D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chambers v. Pruitt
241 S.W.3d 679 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)