Scott Fleming v. The City Of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 30, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-04866·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PATRICIA SCOTT FLEMING, as Admmnistratrix of the Estate of Patrick Fleming, Civgtegse No. 1:18-cv-4866 Plaintiffs Ties □□ -against- pie a □□ pba 7 a ig “ey ite, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Se oe LEp Defendants. SCHEDULING ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following Scheduling Order is entered, subject to the rights of the parties to modify the schedule by stipulation and the right of any party to request that the Court modify the Scheduling Order for good cause shown, including subject to the right of the City Defendants (i) to move to bifurcate discovery and/or trial for purposes of Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York , 436 U.S. 658 (1978), (ii) to ask that the Court direct the parties to confer on a detailed schedule for expert discovery and summary judgment 30 days before the close of fact discovery, and (iii) to ask that the Court defer deadlines for expert disclosures until after motions for summary judgment have been resolved by the Court.

Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures January 6, 2021 Close of Fact Discovery September 15, 2021 Completion of Expert Discovery December 30, 2021 Summary Judgment Motions No later than 30 days following completion of all discovery Pretrial Conference To be determined on a date no later than 60 days prior to the date set for trial. Trial To be determined by the Court.

SO ORDERED NCV 2 9 2020 THE HONORABLE GEORGE B. DANIELS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE District Court for the Southern District of New York DATED:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott Fleming v. The City Of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Scott Fleming v. The City Of New York (Scott Fleming v. The City Of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
436 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1978)