Scott Electric Co. v. Commonwealth

704 A.2d 205, 1998 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 10
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 7, 1998
DocketAppeal No. 153 F.R. 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 704 A.2d 205 (Scott Electric Co. v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scott Electric Co. v. Commonwealth, 704 A.2d 205, 1998 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 10 (Pa. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Before this court are exceptions filed by Scott Electric Company (Scott) to this court’s order of April 4, 1997, in which we affirmed the February 23, 1993 order of the Pennsylvania Board of Finance and Review (Board) denying Scott a refund request for taxes paid on the value of its capital stock. In affirming the Board’s order, we concluded, contrary to Scott’s position, that an S corporation may not assume the tax liability of its shareholders and then deduct that as an expense in calculating its annual net income for capital stock purposes. Scott Electric Co. v. Commonwealth, 692 A.2d 289 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997). We reasoned that, although such a deduction may be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, it is specifically prohibited by section 155.26(g) of the Commonwealth Department of Revenue (Department) regulations, 61 Pa.Code § 155.26(g), the third provision of which disallows adjustments to income for Commonwealth personal income [206]*206tax paid by the shareholders of corporations electing S corporation treatment. Id.

After oral argument and careful review, both of this court’s opinion in Scott and of the exceptions filed to that opinion, we conclude that our decision in Scott is correct. Accordingly, we overrule the exceptions filed by Scott and affirm this court’s order of April 4, 1997.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 1998, we overrule the exceptions filed by Scott Electric Company and affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, dated April 4,1997.

LEADBETTER, J., did not participate in the decision in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.S. Leventhal v. Com Com. v. R.S. Leventhal
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
J. Thompson v. Com Com. v. J. Thompson
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
A. Sharpe v. Com Com. v. A. Sharpe
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
R.J. Marshall, Jr. v. Com Com. v. R.J. Marshall, Jr.
197 A.3d 294 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)
C.S. & C.L. Andrews v. Com Com. v. C.S. & C.L. Andrews
196 A.3d 1090 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2018)
Jerry's Bar, Inc. v. Commonwealth
172 A.3d 1196 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
Saturday Family LP v. Com. Techspec Inc. v. Com.
148 A.3d 931 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2016)
Southern Pines Trucking v. Commonwealth
42 A.3d 1222 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Marshall v. Commonwealth
41 A.3d 67 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Delgaizo v. Commonwealth
8 A.3d 429 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)
Shawnee Development, Inc. v. Commonwealth
799 A.2d 882 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 A.2d 205, 1998 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-electric-co-v-commonwealth-pacommwct-1998.