Scott Eldred Coalwell v. State
This text of Scott Eldred Coalwell v. State (Scott Eldred Coalwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-16-00159-CR
SCOTT ELDRED COALWELL, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015-937-C1
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Scott Eldred Coalwell’s pro se May 5, 2016 letter is sufficient to serve as
his notice of appeal;1 it was filed on May 20, 2016. The order of deferred adjudication
being appealed is dated August 31, 2015. Coalwell’s notice of appeal is untimely, and we
have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); Olivo v. State,
918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice of
1 A defendant’s letter that demonstrates a desire to appeal is sufficient to serve as a notice of appeal. See Palma v. State, 76 S.W.3d 638, 641-42 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2002, pet. ref’d); see also Pharris v. State, 196 S.W.3d 369, 372 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.). appeal is untimely).
Also, Coalwell signed a waiver of his right to appeal, and the trial court’s
certification of defendant’s right to appeal in this case states that Coalwell waived his
right to appeal. This appeal is therefore dismissed.2 See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v.
State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals … must dismiss a
prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”); Davis
v. State, 205 S.W.3d 606, 607 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.).
REX D. DAVIS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed May 26, 2016 Do not publish [CR25]
2A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a). Coalwell v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott Eldred Coalwell v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-eldred-coalwell-v-state-texapp-2016.