SCOTT D. DUNAVENT v. SHANNON LAVIDA DUNAVENT

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 2022·No. 21-2790·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

SCOTT D. DUNAVENT, Appellant,

v.

SHANNON LAVIDA DUNAVENT, Appellee.

No. 4D21-2790

[December 7, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Renatha Francis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502019DR009555XXXXMB.

Elaine L. Thompson, Brandon, and Ama N. Appiah of Law Office of Ama N. Appiah, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Jonathan S. Root and Christopher A. Tiso of Jonathan S. Root, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Esaw v. Esaw, 965 So. 2d 1261, 1264 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“The most salient impediment to meaningful review of the trial court’s decision is not the absence of findings, but the absence of a transcript.”).

GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCOTT D. DUNAVENT v. SHANNON LAVIDA DUNAVENT, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

SCOTT D. DUNAVENT v. SHANNON LAVIDA DUNAVENT (SCOTT D. DUNAVENT v. SHANNON LAVIDA DUNAVENT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Esaw v. Esaw
965 So. 2d 1261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)