Scott Browning v. Tane Bacino

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 12, 2012·No. 01-12-00409-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 12, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00409-CV ——————————— SCOTT BROWNING, Appellant V. TANE BACINO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2009-62141

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal of the trial court’s September 1, 2011

confirmation of an arbitration award. The October 4, 2012 notice of appeal

appears to be untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. No clerk’s record has been filed. Browning did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.3.

On May 3, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified Browning that we would

dismiss this appeal for failure to pay the $175.00 filing fee unless the fee was paid

no later than May 14, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees),

42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal). Browning did not respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

Per Curiam

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Sharp, and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott Browning v. Tane Bacino, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Scott Browning v. Tane Bacino (Scott Browning v. Tane Bacino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.