Scott Browning v. Tane Bacino
Opinion
Opinion issued July 12, 2012
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00409-CV ——————————— SCOTT BROWNING, Appellant V. TANE BACINO, Appellee
On Appeal from the 310th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2009-62141
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal of the trial court’s September 1, 2011
confirmation of an arbitration award. The October 4, 2012 notice of appeal
appears to be untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. No clerk’s record has been filed. Browning did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 26.3.
On May 3, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified Browning that we would
dismiss this appeal for failure to pay the $175.00 filing fee unless the fee was paid
no later than May 14, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees),
42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal). Browning did not respond.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.
Per Curiam
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Sharp, and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott Browning v. Tane Bacino (Scott Browning v. Tane Bacino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.