Scott-Brown v. Cohen

54 F. App'x 140
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2002·No. No. 02-2140·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Latrese D. Scott-Brown appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants as to some claims and a monetary judgment based upon a jury verdict in her favor as to other claims in this action pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Scott-Brown v. Cohen, No. CA-00-3570-AW (D. Md. Aug. [141]*14114, 2001; July 15, 2002; filed July 18 and entered July 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott-Brown v. Cohen, 54 F. App'x 140 (4th Cir. 2002).

54 F. App'x 140 (Scott-Brown v. Cohen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Payne v. Salazar
628 F. Supp. 2d 42 (District of Columbia, 2009)
Payne v. Kempthorne
District of Columbia, 2009