Scotland v. East Branch Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Scotland v. East Branch Mining Co.

56 Cal. 625

California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1880·No. No. 7,423·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

In this cause an appeal from the judgment is prosecuted by defendants Smith and Crittenden, against whom no judgment had been rendered. The appeal is therefore prematurely taken, and should be dismissed.

There is also an appeal by Crittenden from an order refusing to set aside a judgment by default against him.

There having been no judgment against him, this appeal is also prematurely taken.

The appeals are therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

In this cause an appeal from the judgment is prosecuted by defendants Smith and Crittenden, against whom no judgment had been rendered. The appeal is therefore prematurely taken, and should be dismissed.

There is also an appeal by Crittenden from an order refusing to set aside a judgment by default against him.

There having been no judgment against him, this appeal is also prematurely taken.

The appeals are therefore dismissed.

Scotland v. East Branch Mining Co., 56 Cal. 625 (Cal. 1880).

Pincite

56 Cal. 625 (Scotland v. East Branch Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related