Scot Thompson Farms, LLC v. HAP Holdings Trust
This text of Scot Thompson Farms, LLC v. HAP Holdings Trust (Scot Thompson Farms, LLC v. HAP Holdings Trust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
SCOT THOMPSON FARMS, LLC,
Plaintiff, 8:23CV25
vs. ORDER
HAP HOLDINGS TRUST, and HCJ HOLDINGS TRUST,
Defendants.
An individual, Jan M. Mengedoht has filed a pro se answer (Filing No. 13) to Plaintiff’s Complaint on behalf of the defendants, HAP Holdings Trust and HCJ Holdings Trust. However, a trust cannot litigate in this forum without representation by licensed counsel. Mr. Mengedoht, as a nonlawyer, cannot represent the interests of the defendant-trusts in this court. See Knoefler v. United Bank of Bismarck, 20 F.3d 347, 347-48 (8th Cir. 1994) (“A nonlawyer, such as these purported ‘trustee(s) pro se’ has no right to represent another entity, i.e., a trust, in a court of the United States.”). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED: 1. On or before March 16, 2023, the defendants, HAP Holdings Trust and HCJ Holdings Trust, shall obtain the services of counsel and have that attorney file an appearance on their behalf, in the absence of which the court may file an entry and/or judgment of default against the defendants without further notice. 2. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the defendants, c/o Jan M. Mengedoht at 19855 County Road 11, Herman, NE 68029.
Dated this 14th day of February, 2023. BY THE COURT:
s/Michael D. Nelson United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scot Thompson Farms, LLC v. HAP Holdings Trust, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scot-thompson-farms-llc-v-hap-holdings-trust-ned-2023.