Scot Thompson Farms, LLC v. HAP Holdings Trust

District Court, D. Nebraska·Decided February 14, 2023·No. 8:23-cv-00025·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

SCOT THOMPSON FARMS, LLC,

Plaintiff, 8:23CV25

vs. ORDER

HAP HOLDINGS TRUST, and HCJ HOLDINGS TRUST,

Defendants.

An individual, Jan M. Mengedoht has filed a pro se answer (Filing No. 13) to Plaintiff’s Complaint on behalf of the defendants, HAP Holdings Trust and HCJ Holdings Trust. However, a trust cannot litigate in this forum without representation by licensed counsel. Mr. Mengedoht, as a nonlawyer, cannot represent the interests of the defendant-trusts in this court. See Knoefler v. United Bank of Bismarck, 20 F.3d 347, 347-48 (8th Cir. 1994) (“A nonlawyer, such as these purported ‘trustee(s) pro se’ has no right to represent another entity, i.e., a trust, in a court of the United States.”). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED: 1. On or before March 16, 2023, the defendants, HAP Holdings Trust and HCJ Holdings Trust, shall obtain the services of counsel and have that attorney file an appearance on their behalf, in the absence of which the court may file an entry and/or judgment of default against the defendants without further notice. 2. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the defendants, c/o Jan M. Mengedoht at 19855 County Road 11, Herman, NE 68029.

Dated this 14th day of February, 2023. BY THE COURT:

s/Michael D. Nelson United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scot Thompson Farms, LLC v. HAP Holdings Trust, (D. Neb. 2023).

Scot Thompson Farms, LLC v. HAP Holdings Trust (Scot Thompson Farms, LLC v. HAP Holdings Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knoefler v. United Bank of Bismarck
20 F.3d 347 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)