Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling Support

Opinion

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - ) ) Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling ) ASBCA No. 61612 Support ) ) Under Contract No. N00174-11-D-0004 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Mark Martins, Esq. The Mark Martins Law Office, PLLC Washington, DC

Christopher C. Bouquet, Esq. The Law Office of Christopher C. Bouquet, PLLC Alexandria, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Allison M. McDade, Esq. Navy Chief Trial Attorney Sharon G. Hutchins, Esq. David M. Ruddy, Esq. Trial Attorneys

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCILMAIL ON THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

The government requests that we clarify our recent opinion granting, in part, the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Scot Cardillo dba Eng’rs Tooling Support, ASBCA No. 61612, 2025 WL 2166130 (July 15, 2025), to identify which counts of appellant’s 66-page, 17-count complaint have been dismissed. * The opinion identifies one of those counts as dismissed; otherwise, the opinion identifies the claims that are dismissed from the appeal. Id.; slip op. at 5-6. As we said in a different context in Grumman Aerospace Corp., ASBCA Nos. 46834, 48006, 98-2 BCA ¶ 29,942 at 148,151-52, “[w]e see no ambiguity in the Board’s decision that requires clarification.” The motion for clarification is denied.

Dated: September 10, 2025

TIMOTHY P. MCILMAIL Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Signatures continued)

* Gov’t mot. at 1. I concur I concur

OWEN C. WILSON MICHAEL N. O’CONNELL Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61612, Appeal of Scot Cardillo dba Engineers Tooling Support, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals