Scordo v. Terrell
275 A.D.2d 940
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 6, 1949
StatusPublished
This text of 275 A.D.2d 940 (Scordo v. Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scordo v. Terrell, 275 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).
Opinion
Since it is clear from the affidavits that defendant’s default was neither inadvertent nor excusable, and that no meritorious defense is shown, it was an improvident exercise of discretion [941]*941to grant the motion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scordo-v-terrell-nyappdiv-1949.