Scordley v. Olsher

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Scordley v. Olsher

18 Misc. 2d 424, 186 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3653

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 21, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 Misc. 2d 424 (Scordley v. Olsher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scordley v. Olsher, 18 Misc. 2d 424, 186 N.Y.S.2d 883, 1959 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The contract between the parties was prepared by the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs, as well as the defendant, are bound by the provisions thereof. Plaintiffs, having failed to prove that they gave the defendant the five-day written notice specifically provided for in that contract, did not make out a prima facie case and were not entitled to a recovery.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for defendant, with costs.

Concur — Hoestadter, J. P., Hecht and Aurelio, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI