Home/New York Court of Appeals/Scorcia v. State Div. of Human Rights

Scorcia v. State Div. of Human Rights

265 N.E.2d 925, 27 N.Y.2d 912
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 9, 1970
StatusPublished

This text of 265 N.E.2d 925 (Scorcia v. State Div. of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scorcia v. State Div. of Human Rights, 265 N.E.2d 925, 27 N.Y.2d 912 (N.Y. 1970).

Opinion

27 N.Y.2d 912 (1970)

Vito Scorcia et al., Appellants-Respondents,
v.
State Division of Human Rights, Respondent-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 18, 1970.
Decided December 9, 1970.

Isadore B. Hurwitz for appellants-respondents.

Joan Offner and Henry Spitz for State Division of Human Rights, respondent-appellant.

Conrad K. Harper, Jack Greenberg and Sylvia Drew for Naomi Smiley, respondent-appellant.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scorcia v. State Division of Human Rights
265 N.E.2d 925 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 N.E.2d 925, 27 N.Y.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scorcia-v-state-div-of-human-rights-ny-1970.