Scoggins v. State

179 S.E. 205, 51 Ga. App. 6, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 511
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 8, 1935·No. 24543·Published

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

I. “A verdict is not illegal because it is entered on the wrong paper.” Liverpool &c. Ins. Co. v. Peoples Bank, 143 Ga. 355 (2-a) (85 S. E. 114). In the instant ease the accused was tried on an accusation charging him with possessing whisky. During the trial another accusation, showing a previous conviction of the defendant for a similar offense, was put in evidence, and both accusations were taken to the jury room. By inadvertence the jury wrote its verdict on the accusation which had been admitted as evidence. Under the foregoing ruling, the verdict was not illegal because it was written on the wrong paper. See also Roberts v. State, 14 Ga. 18, 19; Harris v. Barden, 24 Ga. 72; Patterson v. Murphy, 63 Ga. 281; Sapp v. Parrish, 3 Ga. App. 234 (2), 236 (59 S. E. 821).

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the overruling of the certiorari was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., eoncw.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scoggins v. State, 179 S.E. 205, 51 Ga. App. 6, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

179 S.E. 205 (Scoggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. State
14 Ga. 18 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1853)
Harris v. Barden
24 Ga. 72 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1858)
Patterson v. Murphy
63 Ga. 281 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)
Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Peoples Bank
85 S.E. 114 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Sapp v. Parrish
59 S.E. 821 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)