Scoggins v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Scoggins v. People

2012 CO 16, 271 P.3d 515, 2012 WL 691762

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedMarch 5, 2012

DocketNo. 10SC15

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2012 CO 16 (Scoggins v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scoggins v. People, 2012 CO 16, 271 P.3d 515, 2012 WL 691762 (Colo. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

11 Justice Hobbs, Justice Rice, and Justice Eid are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, People v. Scoggins, 240 P.3d 331, 334 (Colo.App.2009), should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Bender, Justice Coats, and Justice Boatright are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

{2 Because the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice MARQUEZ does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

11 Justice Hobbs, Justice Rice, and Justice Eid are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, People v. Scoggins, 240 P.3d 331, 334 (Colo.App.2009), should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Bender, Justice Coats, and Justice Boatright are of the opinion that it should be reversed.

{2 Because the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice MARQUEZ does not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2012 CO 16, 271 P.3d 515, 2012 WL 691762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scoggins-v-people-colo-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack