Scoffield v. Loder

2 Johns. Cas. 75
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The tenant is entitled to an alias summons The insufficient service of the first writ, or its defective return, is not imputable to him, and he ought not to be placed in a worse condition than if nihil had been returned. Let an alias issue.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scoffield v. Loder, 2 Johns. Cas. 75 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

2 Johns. Cas. 75 (Scoffield v. Loder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seaman v. Drake
1 Cai. Cas. 9 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)