Scoffield v. Loder
2 Johns. Cas. 75
This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 75 (Scoffield v. Loder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scoffield v. Loder, 2 Johns. Cas. 75 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
The tenant is entitled to an alias summons The insufficient service of the first writ, or its defective return, is not imputable to him, and he ought not to be placed in a worse condition than if nihil had been returned. Let an alias issue.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Seaman v. Drake
1 Cai. Cas. 9 (New York Supreme Court, 1803)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Cas. 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scoffield-v-loder-nysupct-1800.