Scocozzo v. Rhoden
This text of Scocozzo v. Rhoden (Scocozzo v. Rhoden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-2481 _____________________________
ANTHONY SCOCOZZO,
Petitioner,
v.
SCOTT RHODEN,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
July 10, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Loor v. State, 271 So. 3d 105, 105–06 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019).
B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Anthony Scocozzo, pro se, Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scocozzo v. Rhoden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scocozzo-v-rhoden-fladistctapp-2024.