Scocozzo v. Pena

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 2025·No. 1D2024-2705·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2024-2705

ANTHONY SCOCOZZO, Petitioner, v.

JUDGE PHILLIP PENA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

February 26, 2025

PER CURIAM.

The Court withdraws the order issued December 5, 2024, and substitutes this decision in its place.

DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003)

(holding that generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel).

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Anthony Scocozzo, pro se, Petitioner. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scocozzo v. Pena, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Scocozzo v. Pena (Scocozzo v. Pena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)