Sciremammana v. City of New York

271 A.D.2d 842

This text of 271 A.D.2d 842 (Sciremammana v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sciremammana v. City of New York, 271 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages resulting from plaintiff’s fall iipon a public sidewalb, the owners and the lessee of the abutting premises appeal from a judgment against them based upon a jury verdict awarding plaintiff $7,500, and from an order denying their motions to set aside the verdict. On appeal by the landlords, Franb Bayer et al., the judgment is reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. The appeal of the landlords from the order denying their motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial is dismissed, without costs. On appeal by the tenant, Maurice Langbaum, etc.,, the order and judgment are reversed on the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The plaintiff adduced no legally sufficient evidence to show that the landlords were responsible for the creation of the hole in the sidewalb which allegedly caused plaintiff’s fall. (See Langfelder v. City of New York, 271 App. Div. 309.) The verdict against the appellant-tenant was against the weight of the credible proof. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sciremammana-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1946.