Scippio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scippio v. State

488 So. 2d 144, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1131, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11503

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 13, 1986

DocketNos. 84-2315, 84-2324

StatusPublished

This text of 488 So. 2d 144 (Scippio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scippio v. State, 488 So. 2d 144, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1131, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11503 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking the appellant’s probation, Case No. 84-2324, and his conviction of the substantive offense of armed robbery, Case No. 84-2315. See Christopher v. State, 407 So.2d 198 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910, 102 S.Ct. 1761, 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982); Freiheit v. State, 458 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Ben-Hain v. Tacher, 418 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Strate v. Strate, 328 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 336 So.2d 1184 (Fla.1976); Gibbs v. State, 193 So.2d 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967).

We, nevertheless, vacate the sentences imposed and remand for re-sentencing based upon the state’s concession that the calculations in the guidelines score sheet were improper.

Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; cause remanded for re-sentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking the appellant’s probation, Case No. 84-2324, and his conviction of the substantive offense of armed robbery, Case No. 84-2315. See Christopher v. State, 407 So.2d 198 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910, 102 S.Ct. 1761, 72 L.Ed.2d 169 (1982); Freiheit v. State, 458 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Ben-Hain v. Tacher, 418 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Strate v. Strate, 328 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 336 So.2d 1184 (Fla.1976); Gibbs v. State, 193 So.2d 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967).

We, nevertheless, vacate the sentences imposed and remand for re-sentencing based upon the state’s concession that the calculations in the guidelines score sheet were improper.

Convictions affirmed; sentences vacated; cause remanded for re-sentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 So. 2d 144, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1131, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scippio-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack