Scippio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scippio v. State

348 So. 2d 676

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 9, 1977

DocketNo. 76-1484

StatusPublished

This text of 348 So. 2d 676 (Scippio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scippio v. State, 348 So. 2d 676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. See Treverrow v. State, 194 So.2d 250 (Fla.1967); State v. Crawford, 257 So.2d 898 (Fla.1972); Pickrell v. State, 301 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA, 1974); Jackson v. State, 307 So.2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); State v. Davis, 308 So.2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Hawkins v. State, 312 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. See Treverrow v. State, 194 So.2d 250 (Fla.1967); State v. Crawford, 257 So.2d 898 (Fla.1972); Pickrell v. State, 301 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA, 1974); Jackson v. State, 307 So.2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); State v. Davis, 308 So.2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Hawkins v. State, 312 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

348 So. 2d 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scippio-v-state-fladistctapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack