Scippio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scippio v. State

348 So. 2d 676

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 1977·No. No. 76-1484·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. See Treverrow v. State, 194 So.2d 250 (Fla.1967); State v. Crawford, 257 So.2d 898 (Fla.1972); Pickrell v. State, 301 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA, 1974); Jackson v. State, 307 So.2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); State v. Davis, 308 So.2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Hawkins v. State, 312 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed. See Treverrow v. State, 194 So.2d 250 (Fla.1967); State v. Crawford, 257 So.2d 898 (Fla.1972); Pickrell v. State, 301 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA, 1974); Jackson v. State, 307 So.2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); State v. Davis, 308 So.2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Hawkins v. State, 312 So.2d 229 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

Affirmed.

Scippio v. State, 348 So. 2d 676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

348 So. 2d 676 (Scippio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related