Sciolto v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

106 A.D.2d 622, 484 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21604

This text of 106 A.D.2d 622 (Sciolto v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sciolto v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 106 A.D.2d 622, 484 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21604 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

In an action pursuant to former section 167 (subd 1, par [b]) of the Insurance Law (now Insurance Law, § 3420, subd [a], par [2]), defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pizzuto, J.), dated September 30, 1983, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s cross motion for a stay of the proceedings pending determination of an appeal; and [623]*623(2) a judgment of the same court, dated October 24, 1983, which awarded plaintiffs $77,517.67.

Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248).

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Defendant’s arguments on appeal, including its argument regarding the entry of judgment in the declaratory judgment action, were not raised at Special Term and we decline to consider them on appeal. Therefore, the judgment appealed from should be affirmed. Lazer, J. P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A.D.2d 622, 484 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sciolto-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-nyappdiv-1984.