Scinto v. Preston

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6058

PAUL SCINTO, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EDWARD GLENN PRESTON; RALPH MELTON, JR.; FRANK POLUMBO; ERIC WING; THE CITY OF NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA; ESTATE OF BRIAN LEMAY,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

E&J AUTOMOTIVE, et al.; BRIAN LEMAY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cv-00178-H)

Submitted: July 20, 2010 Decided: August 12, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Scinto, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. James Carlton Thornton, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; W. Walton Kitchin, Jr., COLOMBO, KITCHIN, JOHNSON, DUNN & BALL, LLP, Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul Scinto, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Scinto v. Preston, No. 4:03-cv-00178-H (E.D.N.C. May 28

& Dec. 11, 2009). We grant Scinto’s motion to exceed length

limitations for his informal brief. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED