Scigaj v. Welding
This text of 103 A.D.2d 1045 (Scigaj v. Welding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Motions to dismiss appeal denied; cross motion to permit late filing of notice of appeal denied as academic. Memorandum: Since the several individual actions commenced by plaintiffs were consolidated, they became fused into one action for each of the two sets of plaintiffs. Upon consolidation the action takes on one caption and culminates in one judgment which pronounces the rights of all parties (Siegel, NY Prac, § 127, p 156). We treat the judgment entered December 27,1983 as dismissing the complaint against all defendants. Therefore, the notice of appeal from said judgment served on all defendants preserves plaintiffs’ rights. We add that where actions have been consolidated “costs shall be awarded in the consolidated action as if it had been instituted as a single action, unless the order of consolidation otherwise provides” (CPLR 8104). Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Green, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 A.D.2d 1045, 478 N.Y.S.2d 211, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scigaj-v-welding-nyappdiv-1984.