Scientific Tablet Co. v. Ossege

Sixth Circuit

Scientific Tablet Co. v. Ossege

125 F.2d 151, 52 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 607, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4336

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 15, 1942

DocketNo. 8787

StatusPublished

This text of 125 F.2d 151 (Scientific Tablet Co. v. Ossege) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scientific Tablet Co. v. Ossege, 125 F.2d 151, 52 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 607, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4336 (6th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

In an appeal from a decree dismissing the appellant’s bill charging infringement of the three claims of Suppinger patent No. 1,887,073, for a “method of flavoring in canning, preserving and bottling operation”, which were by the District Court held invalid; and

It appearing that the alleged inventive step over methods old in the art involves nothing more than the addition of a tablet of flavoring matter to the container before sealing as a substitute for the loose and finely divided flavor materials in the com-minuted or granulated form; and

The court perceiving neither novelty nor the exercise of the inventive faculty in this forward step,

It is ordered That the decree below be and it is hereby affirmed upon the findings and conclusions of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

In an appeal from a decree dismissing the appellant’s bill charging infringement of the three claims of Suppinger patent No. 1,887,073, for a “method of flavoring in canning, preserving and bottling operation”, which were by the District Court held invalid; and

It appearing that the alleged inventive step over methods old in the art involves nothing more than the addition of a tablet of flavoring matter to the container before sealing as a substitute for the loose and finely divided flavor materials in the com-minuted or granulated form; and

The court perceiving neither novelty nor the exercise of the inventive faculty in this forward step,

It is ordered That the decree below be and it is hereby affirmed upon the findings and conclusions of the District Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 F.2d 151, 52 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 607, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scientific-tablet-co-v-ossege-ca6-1942.