Scientific Living, Inc. v. Hohensee

235 A.2d 393, 427 Pa. 320, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 483
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 14, 1967·No. Appeal, 74·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal taken under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 P.S. §§672-675, questioning the jurisdiction of the lower court over the person of the defendant, must be quashed.

The Act of 1925, supra, §3, 12 P.S. §674, expressly stipulates that “The appeal here provided for must be taken and perfected within 15 days from the date when the decision is rendered.” (Emphasis added.) This requirement, which was not followed in the instant case, is mandatory and admits of no exceptions. See Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Luzerne County, 390 Pa. 143, 134 *322 A. 2d 657 (1957), and Schwartz v. Schwartz, 419 Pa. 559, 215 A. 2d 614 (1966).

Appeal quashed. Costs on appellant.

Mr. Justice Musmanno took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scientific Living, Inc. v. Hohensee, 235 A.2d 393, 427 Pa. 320, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 483 (Pa. 1967).

235 A.2d 393 (Scientific Living, Inc. v. Hohensee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riverside Memorial Mausoleum v. UMET Trust
32 Pa. D. & C.3d 472 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1980)
Scientific Living, Inc. v. Hohensee
270 A.2d 216 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Malis v. LIEBERMAN
266 A.2d 745 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Fortieth Street & Fairmount Avenue Church of God v. Hawes
263 A.2d 344 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)