Scientific Games International, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue
43 A.3d 1289, 615 Pa. 457, 2012 WL 1624875, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1070
This text of 43 A.3d 1289 (Scientific Games International, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scientific Games International, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Revenue, 43 A.3d 1289, 615 Pa. 457, 2012 WL 1624875, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1070 (Pa. 2012).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2012, the Petition for Permission to Appeal is GRANTED. The questions to be addressed by the parties are
A. Does the Board of Claims have exclusive jurisdiction to determine claims arising under a contract with the Commonwealth, including the claim that a contract exists?
B. Does the exception to the Board of Claims’ exclusive jurisdiction over contract claims apply only when jurisdiction in another forum is otherwise expressly and specifically “provided by law”?
The Board of Claims’ Application for Relief is DISMISSED AS MOOT, without prejudice to the Board of Claims to file an amicus curiae brief per Pa.R.A.P. 531.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
43 A.3d 1289, 615 Pa. 457, 2012 WL 1624875, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scientific-games-international-inc-v-commonwealth-department-of-revenue-pa-2012.