Sciascia v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sciascia v. City of New York

96 A.D.2d 901, 466 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 A.D.2d 901 (Sciascia v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sciascia v. City of New York, 96 A.D.2d 901, 466 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant City of New York from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.), dated February 26, 1982, which directed it to produce and make available to all parties the entire investigatory file prepared by the fire marshal’s office in connection with the fire in question. Order affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the plaintiffs-respondents and respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The City of New York has failed to demonstrate that the materials sought for discovery are exempt under either CPLR 3101 (subd [gl) or section 87 (subd 2, par [gl) of the Public Officers Law (see Matter of Polansky u Regan, 81 AD2d 102; Pataki u Kiseda, 80 AD2d 100). Titone, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant City of New York from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.), dated February 26, 1982, which directed it to produce and make available to all parties the entire investigatory file prepared by the fire marshal’s office in connection with the fire in question. Order affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the plaintiffs-respondents and respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The City of New York has failed to demonstrate that the materials sought for discovery are exempt under either CPLR 3101 (subd [gl) or section 87 (subd 2, par [gl) of the Public Officers Law (see Matter of Polansky u Regan, 81 AD2d 102; Pataki u Kiseda, 80 AD2d 100). Titone, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 901, 466 N.Y.S.2d 74, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sciascia-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack