Sciarrino v. Ambrus

58 A.D.2d 741, 395 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12867
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 3, 1977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: The expenses of diathermy treatment may not be considered in computing the $500 threshold requirement for a "serious injury” under section 671 (subd 4, par [b]) of the Insurance Law (Geblein v Arida, 55 AD2d 1048; Sanders v Rickard, 51 AD2d 260; see Colenzo v Kernan, 49 AD2d 809). " 'Serious Injury’ ” is defined, under paragraph (a) of subdivision 4 of the same section as a personal injury which results, inter alia, in a "permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function, or system”. The sprains and contusions suffered by plaintiff-respondent, however, as evidenced by his own doctor’s reports contained in the record do not establish any "permanent” loss. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court —partial summary judgment.)

Present — Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sciarrino v. Ambrus, 58 A.D.2d 741, 395 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

58 A.D.2d 741 (Sciarrino v. Ambrus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moren v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
663 F. Supp. 139 (S.D. New York, 1978)