Scianna v. Village of Wappingers Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scianna v. Village of Wappingers Falls

293 A.D.2d 622, 740 N.Y.S.2d 236, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3697

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 293 A.D.2d 622 (Scianna v. Village of Wappingers Falls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scianna v. Village of Wappingers Falls, 293 A.D.2d 622, 740 N.Y.S.2d 236, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Village of Wappingers Falls, dated September 27, 2000, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of charges set forth in specifications 2 and 3 of the charge of misconduct, and terminated his employment with the Village of Wappingers Falls Highway Department.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination of the hearing officer to terminate his employment is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for review or without merit. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Village of Wappingers Falls, dated September 27, 2000, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of charges set forth in specifications 2 and 3 of the charge of misconduct, and terminated his employment with the Village of Wappingers Falls Highway Department.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination of the hearing officer to terminate his employment is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for review or without merit. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 622, 740 N.Y.S.2d 236, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scianna-v-village-of-wappingers-falls-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack