Sciallo v. State

636 So. 2d 759, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2300, 1994 WL 81801
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1025
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 636 So. 2d 759 (Sciallo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sciallo v. State, 636 So. 2d 759, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2300, 1994 WL 81801 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm except for the conviction and sentence for kidnapping. In our view, the evidence fails to meet all of the requirements of Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla.1983). We reverse that conviction and remand with direction to enter judgment for acquittal on that charge.

FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Madson v. Madson
636 So. 2d 759 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
636 So. 2d 759, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2300, 1994 WL 81801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sciallo-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.