Sciallo v. State

636 So. 2d 759, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2300, 1994 WL 81801
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 16, 1994·No. No. 93-1025·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm except for the conviction and sentence for kidnapping. In our view, the evidence fails to meet all of the requirements of Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla.1983). We reverse that conviction and remand with direction to enter judgment for acquittal on that charge.

FARMER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sciallo v. State, 636 So. 2d 759, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2300, 1994 WL 81801 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

636 So. 2d 759 (Sciallo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Madson v. Madson
636 So. 2d 759 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)