Sciallis v. 34-36 Oak Street Corp.

246 A.D. 595

Opinion

Order denying motion of defendant-appellant to vacate receivership unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with leave to renew, on the ground that there is no showing of the inadequacy of security. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sciallis v. 34-36 Oak Street Corp., 246 A.D. 595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 595 (Sciallis v. 34-36 Oak Street Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.