Scialdone v. Shah

197 A.D.2d 567, 602 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9161
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 12, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 197 A.D.2d 567 (Scialdone v. Shah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scialdone v. Shah, 197 A.D.2d 567, 602 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for wrongful death based on psychiatric malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Barone, J.), dated March 16, 1992, [568]*568which (1) denied her cross motion to vacate the findings of the medical malpractice panel, (2) granted the State employee defendants’ motion to amend their answer to raise the defenses of collateral estoppel and res judicata, and (3) granted summary judgment in favor of the State employees, and the defendants Pyramid Construction Co., Majestic Construction Co., Harvey A. Coleman, and Martin M. Butwin cross-appeal from so much of the same order as denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s argument, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant State employees’ motion which was to amend their answer to include the defenses of res judicata and collateral estoppel. The issue of the State employees’ malpractice was necessarily decided in the prior Court of Claims action (see, Scialdone v State of New York, 197 AD2d 568 [decided herewith]; Kaufman v Lilly & Co., 65 NY2d 449, 455; Matter of Kasten v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 47 AD2d 766, 767). Thus, the State employees were entitled to summary judgment.

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodenheiser v. State
47 A.D.3d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Mathieu v. Scalea
285 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Blandford Land Clearing Corp. v. City of New York
275 A.D.2d 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Becker v. State
274 A.D.2d 532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Barber v. Pfeiffer
261 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.D.2d 567, 602 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scialdone-v-shah-nyappdiv-1993.