Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.
14 N.E.2d 802, 277 N.Y. 483, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1009
Opinion
We are of opinion that interest on the verdict should be added from the time the damage accrued. (See Weprin & Glass Building Corp. v. Rosoff Subway Constr. Co., 269 N. Y. 672.)
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.
Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Pinch and Rippey, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc., 14 N.E.2d 802, 277 N.Y. 483, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1009 (N.Y. 1938).
14 N.E.2d 802 (Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirk v. Pineville Mobile Homes, Inc.
310 S.E.2d 210 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1983)
De Long Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.
38 Misc. 2d 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Purcell v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.
173 N.E.2d 865 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
Purcell v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.
11 A.D.2d 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Dowling v. Stephan
206 Misc. 518 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Adler v. Pilot Industries, Inc.
192 Misc. 774 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Flamm v. Noble
72 N.E.2d 886 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)
Grobe v. Kramer
178 Misc. 247 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)