Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.

14 N.E.2d 802, 277 N.Y. 483, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1009

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 1938

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 14 N.E.2d 802 (Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sciaky v. Rodgers & Hagerty, Inc., 14 N.E.2d 802, 277 N.Y. 483, 1938 N.Y. LEXIS 1009 (N.Y. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that interest on the verdict should be added from the time the damage accrued. (See Weprin & Glass Building Corp. v. Rosoff Subway Constr. Co., 269 N. Y. 672.)

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Loughran, Pinch and Rippey, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI