Sciacca v. Vega

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sciacca v. Vega

284 A.D.2d 526, 727 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6748

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 526 (Sciacca v. Vega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sciacca v. Vega, 284 A.D.2d 526, 727 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants purportedly appeal as of right from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated March 31, 2000, which granted an oral motion of the plaintiffs to set aside the jury verdict as inadequate and directed a new trial on the issue of damages unless the defendants stipulated to increase the verdict on damages from $10,000 to $27,500, and (2) a sua sponte amended order of the same court, dated May 22, 2000, which granted the same relief.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The orders purportedly appealed from are only appealable by permission and no such application was made (see, CPLR 5701). Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants purportedly appeal as of right from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated March 31, 2000, which granted an oral motion of the plaintiffs to set aside the jury verdict as inadequate and directed a new trial on the issue of damages unless the defendants stipulated to increase the verdict on damages from $10,000 to $27,500, and (2) a sua sponte amended order of the same court, dated May 22, 2000, which granted the same relief.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The orders purportedly appealed from are only appealable by permission and no such application was made (see, CPLR 5701). Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 526, 727 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sciacca-v-vega-nyappdiv-2001.