Sciacca v. Caruso

754 A.2d 102, 2000 R.I. LEXIS 131, 2000 WL 978620
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 11, 2000·No. No. 99-444-A·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The plaintiffs, Anthony Sciacca, Richard Loffredo, Silvio Molhcone, and Ernest Be-rube, have appealed from an order of the Superior Court denying their appeal from a decision of the Johnston zoning board of review. Review of such a zoning board decision may only be secured by petition for common law writ of certiorari. See, e.g. Gabriele v. Rocchio, 665 A.2d 566, 566 (R.I.1995) (per curiam); Blackstone Park Improvement Ass’n v. State, 448 A.2d 1233, 1241 n. 6 (R.I.1982); Bassi v. Zoning Board of Review of Providence, 107 R.I. 702, 705-06, 271 A.2d 210 (1970).

Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ appeal is denied and dismissed as procedurally improper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sciacca v. Caruso, 754 A.2d 102, 2000 R.I. LEXIS 131, 2000 WL 978620 (R.I. 2000).

754 A.2d 102 (Sciacca v. Caruso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Northern Trust Co. v. ZONING BOARD OF REVIEW OF THE TOWN OF WESTERLY
899 A.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2006)
Lischio v. Zoning Board of Review, Wc/00-194 (2001)
Superior Court of Rhode Island, 2001