Sciacca v. Caruso
This text of 754 A.2d 102 (Sciacca v. Caruso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The plaintiffs, Anthony Sciacca, Richard Loffredo, Silvio Molhcone, and Ernest Be-rube, have appealed from an order of the Superior Court denying their appeal from a decision of the Johnston zoning board of review. Review of such a zoning board decision may only be secured by petition for common law writ of certiorari. See, e.g. Gabriele v. Rocchio, 665 A.2d 566, 566 (R.I.1995) (per curiam); Blackstone Park Improvement Ass’n v. State, 448 A.2d 1233, 1241 n. 6 (R.I.1982); Bassi v. Zoning Board of Review of Providence, 107 R.I. 702, 705-06, 271 A.2d 210 (1970).
Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ appeal is denied and dismissed as procedurally improper.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
754 A.2d 102, 2000 R.I. LEXIS 131, 2000 WL 978620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sciacca-v-caruso-ri-2000.