Sci Texas Funeral Services, Inc., Individually and D/B/A Buena Vista Burial Park, and as Successor in Interest to Stillbrooke Corp. of Tx D/B/A Buena Vista Burial Park v. Socorro Roussett

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 12, 2005
• Docket: 13-03-00295-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-03-295-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC., INDIVIDUALLY

AND D/B/A BUENA VISTA BURIAL PARK, AND

AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO STILLBROOKE

CORPORATION OF TEXAS D/B/A BUENA VISTA

BURIAL PARK,                                                                 Appellant,

v.

SOCORRO ROUSSETT, ET AL.,                                          Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 107th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Castillo

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

         Appellant, SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A BUENA VISTA BURIAL PARK, AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO STILLBROOKE CORPORATION OF TEXAS D/B/A BUENA VISTA BURIAL PARK, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 1999-12-5297-A. After the record and briefs were filed and after the cause was submitted to the Court, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a settlement regarding the matters at issue in this appeal. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal and that costs be borne by the party incurring same.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs of appeal are adjudged against the party incurring same.

                                                               PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 12^th day of May, 2005.