Schwob v. Hemsath

Nevada Supreme Court

Schwob v. Hemsath

646 P.2d 1212, 98 Nev. 293, 1982 Nev. LEXIS 451

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedJune 23, 1982

DocketNo. 13198

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 646 P.2d 1212 (Schwob v. Hemsath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwob v. Hemsath, 646 P.2d 1212, 98 Nev. 293, 1982 Nev. LEXIS 451 (Neb. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam: 1

The record before this court indicates that the district court entered judgment against a corporation, R.N.S., Inc., which was never served with process in the action. Without proper service of process the district court acquires no jurisdiction over a party. NRCP 4(d); Brockbank v. District Court, 65 Nev. 781, 201 P.2d 299 (1948); State v. District Court, 51 Nev. 206, 273 P. 659 (1929). Nothing in the record before this court suggests that R.N.S., Inc., has ever appeared in the action or subjected itself to the jurisdiction of the court. Cf. Deros v. Stern, 87 Nev. 148, 483 P.2d 648 (1971). It is undisputed that R.N.S., Inc., holds legal title to the property in controversy here, a hardware store in Minden. By its judgment, the district court ordered that the hardware store be conveyed to respondent Hemsath. Thus it is evident that R.N.S., Inc., is an indispensable party. NRCP 19(a); Johnson v. Johnson, 93 Nev. 655, 572 P.2d 925 (1977); Chiodo v. General Waterworks Corporation, 380 F.2d 860 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1004 (1967). Failure to join an indispensable party is fatal to a judgment and may be raised by an appellate court sua sponte. Provident Bank v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102 (1968); Johnson v. Johnson, supra.

In this case, it is conceded that title to the asset in dispute is in a corporation which has never been served with summons in [295]*295the action, and has never appeared as a defendant. See Blum v. Postal Telegraph, 60 F.Supp. 237 (W.D.Pa. 1945) (plaintiff must comply with service of summons requirements to add party defendant). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand this case with directions to allow the respondent the opportunity to join the party, and to grant a new trial if the party is properly joined. Sandobal v. Armour and Company, 429 F.2d 249 (8th Cir. 1970); McShan v. Sherrill, 283 F.2d 462 (9th Cir. 1960).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam: 1

The record before this court indicates that the district court entered judgment against a corporation, R.N.S., Inc., which was never served with process in the action. Without proper service of process the district court acquires no jurisdiction over a party. NRCP 4(d); Brockbank v. District Court, 65 Nev. 781, 201 P.2d 299 (1948); State v. District Court, 51 Nev. 206, 273 P. 659 (1929). Nothing in the record before this court suggests that R.N.S., Inc., has ever appeared in the action or subjected itself to the jurisdiction of the court. Cf. Deros v. Stern, 87 Nev. 148, 483 P.2d 648 (1971). It is undisputed that R.N.S., Inc., holds legal title to the property in controversy here, a hardware store in Minden. By its judgment, the district court ordered that the hardware store be conveyed to respondent Hemsath. Thus it is evident that R.N.S., Inc., is an indispensable party. NRCP 19(a); Johnson v. Johnson, 93 Nev. 655, 572 P.2d 925 (1977); Chiodo v. General Waterworks Corporation, 380 F.2d 860 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1004 (1967). Failure to join an indispensable party is fatal to a judgment and may be raised by an appellate court sua sponte. Provident Bank v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102 (1968); Johnson v. Johnson, supra.

In this case, it is conceded that title to the asset in dispute is in a corporation which has never been served with summons in [295]*295the action, and has never appeared as a defendant. See Blum v. Postal Telegraph, 60 F.Supp. 237 (W.D.Pa. 1945) (plaintiff must comply with service of summons requirements to add party defendant). Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand this case with directions to allow the respondent the opportunity to join the party, and to grant a new trial if the party is properly joined. Sandobal v. Armour and Company, 429 F.2d 249 (8th Cir. 1970); McShan v. Sherrill, 283 F.2d 462 (9th Cir. 1960).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

646 P.2d 1212, 98 Nev. 293, 1982 Nev. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwob-v-hemsath-nev-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack