Schwitzerlet-Seigler Co. v. Citizens & Southern Bank
118 S.E. 368, 155 Ga. 747, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 162
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schwitzerlet-Seigler Co. v. Citizens & Southern Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 155 Ga. 740 →
Opinion
In the present ease the special demurrer was met by appropriate amendment to the petition. On the question raised by the general demurrer that the petition did not set out a cause of action, the case is controlled by the principle ruled in the case of Sehwitzerlet-Seigler Company v. Citizens & Southern Bank, decided June 7, 1923; and the [748]*748judgment of the trial court in overruling the demurrer to the petition is therefore affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schwitzerlet-Seigler Co. v. Citizens & Southern Bank, 118 S.E. 368, 155 Ga. 747, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 162 (Ga. 1923).
118 S.E. 368 (Schwitzerlet-Seigler Co. v. Citizens & Southern Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.