Schwinger v. Hickox

46 How. Pr. 114, 1873 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 286
Superior Court of Buffalo·Decided November 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.,

denied the motion on the ground that the voluntary appearance of the defendants by their attorney was, for all purposes of the action, the equivalent of personal service, and entitled the plaintiff to the costs as adjusted. The case of Macomber agt. The Mayor, &c., of New York (17 Abb. Pr. R., 35), in so far as it holds that a voluntary appearance will not justify a judgment on failure to answer without proof of the actual service of the summons, disapproved. Ho costs allowed, as the question is a new one.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schwinger v. Hickox, 46 How. Pr. 114, 1873 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 286 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

46 How. Pr. 114 (Schwinger v. Hickox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clare v. Lockard
21 Abb. N. Cas. 173 (New York Supreme Court, 1887)