Schwindt v. Miller
This text of Schwindt v. Miller (Schwindt v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
JEFFREY SCHWINDT, MICHAEL E. MILLER, JOSEPH L. MARK, JOHN P. HANCOCK, AND CHARLES BUTCHER, Appellants,
v.
MICHAEL E. MILLER, JOSEPH L. MARK, JOHN P. HANCOCK, AND CHARLES BUTCHER, Appellees. ______________________
2013-1563 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Interference No. 105,805. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JEFFREY B. VOCKRODT, Hunton & Williams LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT M. SCHULMAN and CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN.
LISA J. PIROZZOLO, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellees. With her on the brief were MARK C. FLEMING; DAVID L. CAVANAUGH and OWEN K. ALLEN, of Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schwindt v. Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwindt-v-miller-cafc-2014.