Schwindt v. Miller

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 8, 2014
Docket13-1563
StatusUnpublished

This text of Schwindt v. Miller (Schwindt v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schwindt v. Miller, (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

JEFFREY SCHWINDT, MICHAEL E. MILLER, JOSEPH L. MARK, JOHN P. HANCOCK, AND CHARLES BUTCHER, Appellants,

v.

MICHAEL E. MILLER, JOSEPH L. MARK, JOHN P. HANCOCK, AND CHARLES BUTCHER, Appellees. ______________________

2013-1563 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Interference No. 105,805. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JEFFREY B. VOCKRODT, Hunton & Williams LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT M. SCHULMAN and CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN.

LISA J. PIROZZOLO, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellees. With her on the brief were MARK C. FLEMING; DAVID L. CAVANAUGH and OWEN K. ALLEN, of Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Schwindt v. Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwindt-v-miller-cafc-2014.