Schwinder v. Wilson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schwinder v. Wilson

503 So. 2d 932, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 556, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6818

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 17, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1129

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 503 So. 2d 932 (Schwinder v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwinder v. Wilson, 503 So. 2d 932, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 556, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6818 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s filing of a counterclaim fulfilled the contractual provision that entitled the seller to recover attorney’s fees if she were compelled to take “legal action to enforce” the contract. See Richmond v. Lumb, 339 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. See Stabinski, Funt & De Oliveira, P.A. v. Alvarez, 490 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s filing of a counterclaim fulfilled the contractual provision that entitled the seller to recover attorney’s fees if she were compelled to take “legal action to enforce” the contract. See Richmond v. Lumb, 339 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. See Stabinski, Funt & De Oliveira, P.A. v. Alvarez, 490 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 So. 2d 932, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 556, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwinder-v-wilson-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack