Schwind v. Yacenick

Michigan Court of Appeals

Schwind v. Yacenick

157 N.W.2d 788, 9 Mich. App. 597, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1509

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 20, 1968

DocketDocket No. 2,558

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 N.W.2d 788 (Schwind v. Yacenick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwind v. Yacenick, 157 N.W.2d 788, 9 Mich. App. 597, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1509 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

J. H. G-illis, J.

This case is controlled by DiGiovanni v. Yacenick (1968), 9 Mich App 590. The factual situation and all essential ingredients are the same in each case. In this case, however, the plaintiff was a passenger in the automobile operated by Nick DiGiovanni. The issues presented for our consideration are identical.

We, therefore, affirm the judgment. Costs to appellee.

Quinn, P. J., and McGregor, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. H. G-illis, J.

This case is controlled by DiGiovanni v. Yacenick (1968), 9 Mich App 590. The factual situation and all essential ingredients are the same in each case. In this case, however, the plaintiff was a passenger in the automobile operated by Nick DiGiovanni. The issues presented for our consideration are identical.

We, therefore, affirm the judgment. Costs to appellee.

Quinn, P. J., and McGregor, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 N.W.2d 788, 9 Mich. App. 597, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwind-v-yacenick-michctapp-1968.

Opinion

J. H. G-illis, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack