Schweyer ex rel. Kline v. Walbert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Schweyer ex rel. Kline v. Walbert

42 A. 694, 190 Pa. 334, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1026

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 13, 1899

DocketAppeal, No. 58

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 42 A. 694 (Schweyer ex rel. Kline v. Walbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schweyer ex rel. Kline v. Walbert, 42 A. 694, 190 Pa. 334, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1026 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Our examination of the evidence in support of the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense has satisfied us that it was clearly sufficient to justify the decree making the rule absolute, etc. [341]*341The case was fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by the court below that further comment is unnecessary.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Our examination of the evidence in support of the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense has satisfied us that it was clearly sufficient to justify the decree making the rule absolute, etc. [341]*341The case was fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by the court below that further comment is unnecessary.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A. 694, 190 Pa. 334, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schweyer-ex-rel-kline-v-walbert-pa-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack