SCHWERZMANN & WISE, P.C. v. TOWN OF HOUNSFIELD
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
288 CA 14-00939 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
SCHWERZMANN & WISE, P.C., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
TOWN OF HOUNSFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
PAUL F. SHANAHAN, PITTSFORD, D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JONATHAN B. FELLOWS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered January 7, 2014. The order, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on its account stated cause of action.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: March 27, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
SCHWERZMANN & WISE, P.C. v. TOWN OF HOUNSFIELD (SCHWERZMANN & WISE, P.C. v. TOWN OF HOUNSFIELD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.