Schwer v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd.

Ohio Supreme Court

Schwer v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd.

156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 115

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 11, 1951·No. No. 32267·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented is whether the action of the trial court in granting a new trial amounted to an abuse of discretion. Since the journal entry of the trial court granting the new trial does not disclose on what ground or grounds the motion was allowed, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Tart, Matthias, and Hart, JJ., concur. Middleton, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The question presented is whether the action of the trial court in granting a new trial amounted to an abuse of discretion. Since the journal entry of the trial court granting the new trial does not disclose on what ground or grounds the motion was allowed, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Tart, Matthias, and Hart, JJ., concur. Middleton, J., not participating.

Schwer v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd., 156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 115 (Ohio 1951).

Pincite

156 Ohio St. (N.S.) 115 (Schwer v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.