Schwent v. Evans

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schwent v. Evans

487 S.W.3d 503, 2016 WL 1578970, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 355

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 2016·No. No. ED 102734·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Schwent appeals from the probate court’s judgment finding in favor of Roy Evans, Madonna Livingston, Michelle Craven, and Sherry Mistretta (collectively Respondents) on claims related to the construction of a trust and amendment thereto by Helen D. Just prior to her death. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the probate court committed no error in entering judgment in favor of Respondents. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons [504] for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Schwent appeals from the probate court’s judgment finding in favor of Roy Evans, Madonna Livingston, Michelle Craven, and Sherry Mistretta (collectively Respondents) on claims related to the construction of a trust and amendment thereto by Helen D. Just prior to her death. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the probate court committed no error in entering judgment in favor of Respondents. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons [504] for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Schwent v. Evans, 487 S.W.3d 503, 2016 WL 1578970, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

487 S.W.3d 503 (Schwent v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.